Lie is clear by comparing ★My-Genuine-Plea with ★Judgment.
They judged without basis. Cases are in Case-List. The case numbers are in Civil-Action-List or Criminal-Action-List.
●Japan’s judicial system●
Divided Civil and Criminal.
Judge and bar and prosecutor are lawyer (qualified).
●Civil is max 3-tiered. Anyone can file.
First instance is at district court. alone or panel.
Second instance (appeal) is at high court. panel.
Third instance (appeal) is at Supreme Court. panel.
●Criminal can only be filed by the Public Prosecutors Office.
That is, citizens cannot indict.
After accepting complaint, prosecutor decides indict it or not.
Getting the acceptance is very hard work.
Know-how is required to fit into the Penal Code.
People’s self-do is very hard, so usually leave to bar.
But I was forced myself because 11 bars refused in a row.
Maebashi DPPO’s first acceptance took full 3 years.
Originally they won’t point out my bug, so I cannot correct it.
It’s a jamming by abuse of authority, but they never admit it.
So on the way I forced to file civil case too.
Finally all accepted complaints were rejected. No precedent!!!
And all no reason.
“non-indictment-reason” is merely a classification. sophistry!!!
”Judge-Request” series is restraint against Unfair-Non-Indictment.
It’s a procedure judging the prosecutor for abuse of authority.
The jurisdictional district court judge it by panel.
“appeal” against ”Judge-Request” → High Court by panel.
“special appeal” against “appeal” → Supreme Court by panel.
So total 4 steps at Criminal. I took 4 steps all the cases.
●my pleas repeat●
I always be ignored, so each my plea is similar.
Thus, My Genuine Pleas are also excerpts. = Reflection.
And “Plaintiff’s Plea” stated in judgment is false.
